About Me

Name: Ames Tiedeman
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

THE GREATEST LIE EVER

Climate Gate and The Global Warming Lie
Town Hall ^ | 11/23/09 | TampaDoc 

Posted on November 24, 2009 3:37:43 AM EST by kathsua

Its really is funny when you think about it. Its another fuzzy bunny the left has rolled out to demoralize and destroy capitalism. Remember the "whole in the ozone"? Remember they said the ozone would be gone in ten years? That was 1980, within 10 years the hole was the smallest ever recorded. By the way, look for this again, for a long time there was no significant change. So someone came out with a new scale and all of a sudden it looks bad by the "New Scale" so this may be the next "crisis" now that Global Warming has been exposed as a hoax. The sad thing about this is that all the information has been there all along. True it was beening discredited by the Global Warming Liars (GWL) but it was there. Starting with the fact that the whole foundation on which the whole farse was based was all a lie. The famous "Hockey Stick" graph developed by Michael Mann the father of the Global Warming fraud and the head of GWL (Global Warming Liars), turned out under scientific scrutany to ba a total fraud.

http://www.sodahead.com/world-news/9292009-confirmed---global-warming-hockey-stick-is-a-fraud/blog-180309/

The next big lie is that CO2 is a "Greenhouse Gas". OK, biology 101. What is required for plant life to grow? That's right, CO2! In fact the fossil record show increased CO2 occurs AFTER a warming cycle, not before, and the result is the best plant growth the planet ever expieriences. In other words it's good for the planet. Some scientist (and I agree with this theory) believe that the world oil reserves are from massive algae blooms AFTER and extreme warm cycle in which entire lakes became algae, which died and became fossil fuel. Do a search on CO2 and you'll find most scientist laugh at the CO2 lie. It's like saying O2 is bad for humans. So with all of those scientist laughing at the GWLs they needed to twist the truth again to give themselves some kind of credibility. So they started these lies.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-04/uom-hyb041206.php

Did you ever wonder why it is no longer called Global Warming? Because the planet is getting colder! Yes for ten years it's been getting colder. Now this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who went outside this summer, or last winter for that matter, it's been cold! We have had the coldest somer in 30 years and the third coldest summer in recorded history. That was following the coldest winter in 40 years! So it's getting hard to hide now because it's COLD! o what do the GWLs do? They make up new lies.

http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/global-warming-why-is-it-so-freaking-cold/

So basically they are now saying that its so hot, that it's cold. That's right, you heard it,, it's so hot that its cold! Oh and here is the otehr classic, There is a diffeence between weather and climate. Just because it get's cold, it doesn't mean that it's not hot. So going back to my question, what happened to Global Warming? Well, my mom always said, "When you tell a lie, you have to tell a bigger one to cover it, then the yjust keep getting bigger" Hence, it's now called "Climate Change" by the GWLs.

http://planetgreen.discovery.com/work-connect/glolbal-warming-summer-cold.html

Now I'm not argueing that Earth got warmer then usual during the 90s, it did. But was it caused by CO2, no! Was it cause by man, no! Was it caused by Algore? maybe! Seriously, if you want to know what caused it, it's simple, walk outside at noon tomorrow and look up. That's right, it's the Sun! Solar activity (solar flares, sun spots) effect temperatures. There are regular recorded cycles that have proven that they effect the temeratures. These periods of activity go on for years. This caused warm periods like the Medieval Warm Period where for 400 years temperatures were far in excess of current temperatures.

http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/lia/vikings_during_mwp.html

Now the GWLs claim that it wasn't as warm as it is now, howwever they were trees in Greenland, they were growing grapes in northern England, Greenland and Labrador in areas that to this day can't support cold tolerent hybrids that didn't exist in Medieval times. Oh, nay sayer, you want proof, look at the names of streets and farms in northern England, they are still named after vineyards that have been gone for 800 years.

OK, but you said sunspots are responsible for the warming during the 90s, can you prove that? Well yes I can, either Man Made Global Warming is contagous, or it's fake. It seems Mars has gone through the same temperature cycle we have.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1720024.ece

Isn't that odd that CO2 in our atmosphere would effect a planet that ranges from 36 million miles (at nearest point) to over 250 million miles (furthest point). Wow, that Global warming is much worse then we thought!

OK, so now you are saying "You said "now that Global Warming has been exposed as a hoax", what do you mean? Well, now they've been caught with their pants down. Let's call it Climate Gate!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html

You'll notice our old frienf Micahel Mann was mnetioned for his "Old trick". Well you know the saying, if you repeat a lie enough times.... Well the bottom line is a lie is a lie, Global warming, I mean Man Made Climate Change is a hoax. More and more every day the public is figuring it out.

So why have scientist gone to this extent and lied and made up data? Well, it's simple some did it for the money, wether you get your grants or not can be a great motivator. Some did it for notoriety, let's face it, no one would even know the name Michael Mann if it weren't for him doctoring research. Or who would pay any attention to Algore if it weren't for his lies (oh, yeah, he invented the internet, didn't he). Soe did it for power and redistribution of wealth, let's face it, the rest of the world would love for us to sign the UNFCCC treaty so that we have to pay the world restitution followed by tax on usage and have the UN dictate how much carbon fuels we can use.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf

The bottom line is, if you read all of this and still believe that Man Made Global Warming is real and is caused by CO2, then you are a spit drooling moron and there is no help for you. If you learned anything from this, spread the word, send this to someone. Remember all of you GWLs the truth will set you free!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE MOST ANGRY WOMAN IN AMERICAN POLITICS

Sen. Barbara Boxer is shown here, alongside Sen. Kit Bond, at a committee hearing on Capitol Hill July 21. (AP Photo)

One man's whistleblower is another woman's criminal hacker. 

Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., is calling the leaked e-mails from climate scientists at a British university research unit a "theft" and "crime" that should be investigated, despite calls from Republicans to investigate the contents of the e-mails themselves, not the way they were leaked. 

"You call it Climate-gate. I call it E-mail-theft-gate," Boxer said at a hearing Wednesday on the Committee on Environment and Public Works, which she chairs. She suggested that a criminal conspiracy might even be at play in bringing the once private e-mails to public light. 

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla, ranking Republican on the panel and a vocal global warming skeptic, has instead called for an intensive review of climate change science in light of the e-mails, which appeared to show scientists discussing the manipulation of climate research. He sent a letter to Boxer Tuesday calling for hearings. 

Inhofe spokesman Matt Dempsey said Thursday that his boss continues to believe Congress should be more focused on the scientific data than the conditions of the leak, and suggested Boxer may come around. 

"We think that as she looks closer at the e-mails she'll understand the importance of getting to the bottom of the scandal," he said. But he added that Republicans were "enthused" by Boxer's apparent willingness to have hearings. 

"She left open the fact that the Senate may have hearings on Climate-gate," Dempsey said.

Indeed, Boxer acknowledged Wednesday that her panel might examine the scientific side as requested. 

"The main issue is, are we facing global warming or are we not? ... I'm looking at these e-mails, that have been, even though they were stolen, they are now out in the public," she said. "We may well have a hearing on this, we may not. We may have a briefing for senators, we may not." 

But she made clear that her focus is going to be on pursuing the hackers. 

"This is a crime," she said, entering into the record the section of criminal code that deals with fraud connected with accessing computers without authorization. "Part of our looking at this will be looking at a criminal activity which could have well been coordinated." 

The e-mails have caused waves ahead of an international conference in Copenhagen on climate change. The director of Britain's University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, where the e-mails came from, has already stepped down pending an investigation. 

Republicans are raising broad questions about the science behind global warming in the aftermath. 

"If these e-mails show anything, they show scientists obstructing the scientific process," Inhofe said Wednesday. 

Several Republicans sent a letter to Environmental Protection Agency Director Lisa Jackson Wednesday calling for a "thorough and transparent investigation" into the matter.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More on the total SCAM that is GLOBAL WARMING!

James Delingpole

James Delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books including Welcome To Obamaland: I've Seen Your Future And It Doesn't Work, How To Be Right, and the Coward series of WWII adventure novels. His website is www.jamesdelingpole.com

Climategate: it's all unravelling now

 

So many new developments: which story do we pick? Maybe best to summarise, instead. After all, it’s not like you’re going to find much of this reported in the MSM.

1. Australia’s Senate rejects Emissions Trading Scheme for a second time. Or: so turkeys don’t vote Christmas. Expect to see a lot more of this: politicians starting to become aware their party’s position on AGW is completely out of kilter with the public mood and economic reality. Kevin Rudd’s Emissions Trading Scheme – what Andrew Bolt calls “a $114 billion green tax on everything” – would have wreaked havoc on the coal-dependent Australian economy. That’s why several opposition Liberal frontbenchers resigned rather than vote with the Government on ETS; why Liberal leader Malcolm Turnbull lost his job; and why the Senate voted down the ETS.

2. Danes caught fiddling their carbon credits. (Hat tip: Philip Stott) Carbon trading is the Emperor’s New Clothes of international finance. It was invented by none other than Ken Lay, whose Enron would currently be one of the prime beneficiaries in the global alternative energy market, if it hadn’t been shown to be (nearly) as fraudulent as the current AGW scam. It is a licence to fleece, cheat and rob. Still, jolly embarrassing for the Danes to get caught red handed, what with their hosting a conference shortly in which the world’s leaders will try, straight-faced, to persuade us that carbon emissions trading is the only viable way of defeating ManBearPig.

3. Hats off to The Daily Express – the first British newspaper to make the AGW scam its front page story.

Express

The piece was inspired by another bravura performance by Professor Ian Plimer, the Aussie geologist who argues that climate change has been going on quite naturally, oblivious of human activity, for the last 4,567 million years.

4. BBC finally gets round to reporting – sort of – that Climatic Research Unit at University of East Anglia may have been up to no good. It’s true that this report on their website is so hedged with special pleading for the temporarily suspended director Phil Jones the man might have written it himself. But on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme this morning, I did hear the newsreader reporting it as more than just a routine theft story. Which is a start.

5. Legal actions ahoy! Over the next few weeks, one thing we can be absolutely certain of is concerted efforts by the rich, powerful and influential AGW lobby to squash the Climategate story. We’ve seen this already in the “nothing to see here” response of Dr Rajendra Pachauri, the jet-setting, troll-impersonating railway engineer who runs the IPCC and wants to stop ice being served with water in restaurants. This is why those of us who oppose his scheme to carbon-tax the global economy back to the dark ages must do everything in our power to bring the scandal to a wider audience. One way to do this is law suits.

At Ian Plimer’s lunch talk yesterday, Viscount Monckton talked of at least two in the offing – both by scientists, one British, one Canadian, who intend to pursue the CRU for criminal fraud. Their case, quite simply, is that the scientists implicated in Climategate have gained funding and career advancement by twisting data, hiding evidence, and shutting out dissenters by corrupting the peer-review process. More news on this, as I hear it.

Lord Monckton has written an indispensible summary of the Climategate revelations so far.

6. Watch out Green Dave! The Independent reports on the growing backlash within the party to Cameron’s libtard-wooing greenery. Turning to the Independent for a balanced report on environmental matters is a bit like consulting Der Sturmer for a sensible, insightful view on the Jewish question. Still, for once, the house journal of eco-loonery seems to have got it right and the point made by Tory backbencher David Davis is well made:

“The ferocious determination to impose hair-shirt policies on the public – taxes on holiday flights, or covering our beautiful countryside with wind turbines that look like props from War of the Worlds – is bound to cause a reaction in any democratic country.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »